The Reading Life

I still like to read but I've not had good luck finding new books that scratch the itch.  There's been a few I really enjoyed.:  "The Passenger" by my favorite author, Cormac McCarthy and "The Library at Mount Char" by Scott Hawkins. And I, recently, enjoyed "The Mountain in the Sea" by Ray Nayler.  It's about intelligent Cephalopods and I do love my Mollusca.

But the list of books I put down after a few pages is far taller.  A couple fall into the category of ones I know I'll read someday, but I just wasn't in the right mood. For example, "Anathem" and "Hard Boiled Wonderland and the End of the World",  Others fall into the "what was I thinking" category.  I wont name these.  I just did not like the writing.  

 I do have to mention the premise of one of the did-not-finish books as it still makes me chuckle:  man-eating mer-people.  I even gave that one two tries. I heard about it from YouTube, where someone was listing the weirded books they had read recently. I think they said there eventually was mer-sex but I never got that far. 

What I have been doing is re-reading old favorites. 

I reread the ten books of "The Malazan Book of the Fallen" and the three books of "The Prince of Nothing" series. Both are great series that got even better with patient re-reading. You can absorb so much more when you're not hurrying to reach the next big plot point. And there's a lot of absorb in both series.  They are both dark and deep works of fantasy, well worth the effort.

I also reread "Fishboy" by Mark Richard and I am currently rereading "The Wrestler's Cruel Study" by Stephen Dobyns. a couple of books, I picked up on the same trip to Barnes and Nobles back in the mid 90s.  It was a lucky day as they both became favorites.. 

"Fishboy" was still excellent but didn't hit the same way it did 30 years ago. The writing is beautiful and poetic but the story lost a little magic. 

We will see about "The Wrestler Cruel Study". It's a weird mash up of religion, philosophy and professional wrestling that I cannot claim to have understood.  I just loved the tangle of idea.   And who knows, I've listened to a lot of the podcast "Philosophize This!" over the last few years, so maybe I'll absorb a bit more this time.

Books I have already purchased but haven't attempted yet include: Susanna Clarke's "Piranesi", the final Cormac McCarthy book "Stella Maris" and a bunch of science fiction and fantasy.  We will see how all of these go.

Happy reading.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Shark Crackers

The movie Jaws has been a fan favorite for 30 years. A lot has been written about the impact Jaws had on the movie making business and summer swimming habits but there's one aspect of the movie that's seldom been discussed, the impact Jaws had on the image of the saltine cracker. Before Robert Shaw's Quint, a cracker was a bland cake of baked flour only good as a surface to hold peanut butter or cheese, but not after. Quint elevated the cracker into the snack of sailors and shark hunters. What man has not wanted to calmly snap chunks of a cracker while saying the words: Y'all know me. Know how I earn a livin'. I'll catch this bird for you, but it ain't gonna be easy. Bad fish! Not like going down to the pond and chasing bluegills and tommycocks. This shark, swallow you whole. No shakin', no tenderizin', down you go. Much like the Eucharist is a symbol of Christ in the Catholic tradition, in Jaws, the cracker forms the edible representation of the
Read more

Running roughshod or ripshod

A common euphamism for political power abuse is saying someone or organization has ' run ripshod ' through the land. I was going to use the phrase myself the other day when I realized I had no idea what ripshod meant. I searched around and found many other users but no place that could define the word. This started me thinking that perhaps every example I found was just a perpetuation of a common mistake. I tried aother variations on the phrase and finnally hit upon a more common usage: run roughshod. The words roughshod and ripshod don't really sound the same but people use them in the same manner in similar contexts. Does anyone know the proper usage?
Read more

Axis, Axes, Axii?

While writing another post (it will probably follow this one) I needed to pluralize axis. None of the guesses I came up with passed the spell checker so I Googled it. The first hit I got was from a drafting company. (Interesting aside: word order matters in Google more than I realized - searching for "plural axis" didn't get the same dictionary oriented results as "axis plural") According to these folks the answer is: Grammatical Note : The plural of axis is axes. Some radical etymologists insist that the plural form of axis is axii, but that is only if there are three or more; One axis, two axes, three axii. The word axii, however, still doesn’t pass the spell checker, so perhaps getting grammar lessons from a drafting company isn’t such a great idea. More legitimate authorities simply list axes as the plural. If you do visit the above link to drafing company, can you answer me a question, what the heck are those diagrams depicting. I
Read more